work in progress
.....
New concept: possibility to stop treatment with Pembro for patients with complete response (Robert ASCO2016)
So the next question is: when can we stop treating?
Summary
Ipi
- durable effect for a few patients (20- 25%)
- dose-effect for efficacy and toxicity (the more drug, the more effect and the more side effects)
- infliction point at 3 years (patients who are alive at 3 years can be expected to be alive at 5 and 10 years)
Anti-PD1s
- better than Ipi: higher response rate, fewer side effects
- highest response for patients with high PDL1 levels
PDL1 is NOT a reliable biomarker
- its expression in the tissue is heterogeneous (uneven)
and it is inducible, so can changer over time.
Caroline Robert- does not use PDL1 testing for clinical practice as not established enough yet; she is experimentally testing for the contact between PD1 and PDL1 (as one can have PDL1 expressed but no T-cells in the tumour).
Combination of Ipi/ PD1 better than PD1 alone but coming with severe toxicity- this is the AACR data from Larkin.
The data is not mature yet, so the curves could separate further.
Question to Caroline Robert- what do you do upon progression on PD1 mono-therapy for BRAF wild-type patients?
Possibilities: Ipi or Ipi/Nivo- EORTC trial ongoing
Note
13% Ipi response rate when given after resistance to PD1, similar to what is seen as first-line
(find reference)
Robert- she would stop treatment with Pembro if the patient wants to stop but not enough data yet to be sure
Target therapies- next steps
Paul Chapman
Again-
- BRAF plus MEK is better than BRAF alone
- Most patients become resistant but some patients stay on them for a long time (see yesterday)
Interesting combi of Phenformin with Dab/ Trab- he is running this in a trial.
3 classes of BRAF mutations- important as responding differently to treatment
RAS-independent
Class 1- V600E, functions are monomers
Class 2- function as dimers to activate MEK/ERK
RAS-dependent
Class 3- activating RAS mutation
Zhan Yoa, Cancer Cell 2015, also just submitted
Options for patients who progress
Ragini Kudchadkar
3 groups of disease presentation
- primary progression in the brain
- rapid progression
- slow progression
What to do upon progression?
Chemo
can sometimes work
IL2
Surgery
Radiation
Intra-tumoral Approaches
T-Vec
Ipi + T-Vec (abstract 9509)
Ipi + HF-10 (abstract 9510)
Re-challenge with earlier therapies
Ipi- same response rate upon re-challenge
Q- maybe re-challenge with 10mg/kg instead of 3 mg/kg?
Prolonging time to resistance by intermittent treatment with targeted therapy S1320
comment speaker: many patients inadvertently on intermittent regimens due to drug holidays for side effects
Interesting- find trial
Ascierto running a trial testing targeted short-term (3 months), followed by immune therapy versus immune therapy directly.
Intra-tumoral Approaches
T-Vec
Ipi + T-Vec (abstract 9509)
Ipi + HF-10 (abstract 9510)
Re-challenge with earlier therapies
Ipi- same response rate upon re-challenge
Q- maybe re-challenge with 10mg/kg instead of 3 mg/kg?
Prolonging time to resistance by intermittent treatment with targeted therapy S1320
comment speaker: many patients inadvertently on intermittent regimens due to drug holidays for side effects
Interesting- find trial
Ascierto running a trial testing targeted short-term (3 months), followed by immune therapy versus immune therapy directly.
No comments:
Post a Comment